« How Halo 2 AI works | Main | Things that make a parent proud »
Tuesday, November 23, 2004
v.Sad & heartpain: the anguish of a mother with an autistic son
"I so envy yr girl in AWWA,my son muz wait 2 yr & tis few mth i v.Sad cos he rigid worse,eg brg him hm he want take lift 2 times,1 day i refuse he cry 1 hr,at nite he wakeup 4am WANT TO TAKE LIFT! He oledy wakeup 3 nites insist do tigs we refuse him do during daytime,he cant expres i find him so poor thing,so wory w so many speech terepy he stil cant talk,sometime he want sometig cant expres keep cry,i hv urge open tat kirkman let him eat,v.Sad & heartpain"
My heart feels raw, and my throat has a lump that will not go down, even as I type this.
This was an sms my wife received from a mother whom she communicates with from time to time. They don't know each other, and they have never met, but they started exchanging text messages and words of encouragement, because of some therapy questions that this mom had some time ago, and someone referred her to my wife. Two women, total strangers, united by a common challenge.
It is exactly 3 sms-lengths long, and despite the economy of words, and concise nature of the message, you can feel her anguish as she struggles with her son's autism. While it doesn't do her words justice, I will try my best to paraphrase:
"I am so envious of your daughter who can attend the Asian Women's Welfare Association's (AWWA) Special School. My son must wait for two years to get in. And these few months, I have been very sad because his need for a rigid routine is getting worse.
For example, when I take him home, he wants to take the lift twice. One day, I refused and he cried for an hour. At night, he woke up at 4am and WANTED TO TAKE THE LIFT! He had already woken up three nights in a row, insisting on doing things we did not let him do during the day.
He can't express himself, and I feel he is such a poor thing. I am so worried that with so many speech therapy lessons, he still can't talk. Sometimes, when he wants something but can't express it, he will keep crying. I feel the urge to open that bottle of Kirkman vitamins (usually B6 which some believe autistic children are deficient in) for him to eat.
I feel very sad and it pains my heart."
There are more than 300 children with autism, waiting for their turn to attend a special school. Many of them are on a two to three-year waiting list because there are not enough special school places, trained special school teachers and generally not enough resources.
The irony is, experts agree that early intervention is one most effective ways to help kids with autism. But by the time these kids are diagnosed, put on a two-year queue, and maybe get into a special school equipped to help them, it is no longer early.
Meanwhile, the right to have compulsory education remains only for "normal" children, and the training of Special Ed teachers does not come under the Ministry of Education's (MOE) purview, but comes under the Ministry of Community, Youth and Sports (MCYS).
Children with special needs require highly trained teachers who have the skills, the heart and the stamina to give these kids a shot at a functional future. In fact, the kind of training these special teachers need is at least as rigorous, if not more so, than those involved in teaching gifted students at tertiary-level schools. They certainly are not child minders or pre-school teachers, even though their charges are young and below normal schooling age.
The reason their charges are young is because these kids need to be given intervention and therapy as young as possible, in order to even learn the most basic of things, like how to learn.
But no, the MOE is only responsible for "normal" children of Primary school age and above. So the formal training these special teachers need is not under their care, nor is the syllabus. No, these special children so young, so must be under MCYS, because the kindergartens and childcare centres are its responsibility, which the ministry does its best to carry out.
When I read of another premier junior college moving into their new "sprawling 8.6ha campus in Bishan" with a new "buffet-style A-level curriculum" being offered to their top-scoring O-level students, I cannot help but think of my daughter's school, whose new premises has been delayed indefinitely because their contractor went bust, and her small pool of special teachers who are stretched, like butter over too much bread, trying to cater to as many special kids as they can.
I recall the PM's speech, where he said that he wanted an "open and inclusive society", where no one will be left behind, and I feel hope.
But I also recall another speech he made where he announced some important measures the Government is taking to help the disabled. In that speech he also said, "Together with the support provided by NCSS, this will provide SPED schools with nearly 4 times the level of funding of mainstream primary pupils."
While I am thrilled to hear numbers like this, I cannot help but imagine Government officials saying to special needs children:
"I am sorry, but we already spent nearly four times more on you than the mainstream kids. And your disability, according to our calculations, is only 3.4 times more of a hindrance to normal life, and your contribution to society is only 0.7 times of a normal Singaporean. So we cannot increase your funding or we will be over-subsidising you."
PM also said:
"In helping the disabled, we must take a fair and practical approach, one that can be sustained over the long term, and will not impose too heavy a burden on society as a whole."
"...But in doing more for these children, we should not inadvertently divert so much professional resources and attention away from the normal children as to affect the quality of their education.
"We have to maintain a judicious balance in allocating resources and setting priorities, so that we can improve the quality of education for all our children. That way our future as a society will be brighter, our economy will be stronger, and ultimately the resources we have to help the disabled will be greater."
Ah, there is the "B" word I see so often — "BURDEN". While I know PM means well, using the word "burden" only reinforces the belief in normal people that the disabled are a burden that society must bear. It is an attractive-sounding idea, to fund the "able" so that they can help the "disabled". But it only adds to the alienation that the disabled feel.
One of my readers, who is a deaf special education teacher who teaches primary school deaf kids, once said:
"No no no, the deaf/hearing-impaired/hard of hearing/whatever and people with other special needs are definitely not a burden to society just because of our disabilities. please don't think that way.
"I will never ever tell my students (all of whom have profound deafness) that they are burdens. Yes, it's true things are harder and discrimination is rife for those with disabilities, but we make the best of what we have and think positive.
"People with disabilities ask not for patronising pity, charity, welfare benefits or freebies from the public and government. we ask for understanding, empathy and just that bit of basic human decency. and a fair, fighting chance in daily life."
A fair, fighting chance in daily life. That is what we all want for our children, isn't it? Be they "normal" or special.
Many moms, like the one above, struggle and deal with their autistic kid alone. I say "kid", in the singular, because many of them stop having children after their firstborn is found to be autistic. Partly because of fear, as studies have shown that there is at least a 1 in 20 chance of a sibling having the same problem. And partly because raising one autistic kid is like raising a full brood of regular kids. It is probably harder.
In fact, so many parents refrain from having more children after having one autistic child, geneticists even have a term for it: stoppage.
Not many are like my wife, who has a deep support structure of family and friends, and the courage and stamina to have a second child (who provides another dimension of parenting, and anchors her), and a deep-rooted faith.
Nobody is asking for a handout. Just a little more hope, a little more understanding, and a little less heartpain for those of us with special kids.
In their sms chats, Ginny suggested some things she does with our daughter Faith to reduce her self-stimming behaviour, and the mother replied:
"Maybe girl more tame,i try many ways distract him but fail,therepist say if he wakeup nite tis q.Serios,but to giv in to him make him more rigid,i can't imagine how life 4 him if he cant talk,sory u muz listen my prob..."
No sorry needed. We are always happy to listen. We know how hard it is to want sometig cant expres keep cry.
Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 10:55 AM in Musings | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2139/1449630
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference v.Sad & heartpain: the anguish of a mother with an autistic son:
Comments
Yes, Singapore is not the type of place where children (or any other people for that matter) with any disablity are treated with respect. Generally, the societ as a whole is unforgiving and those who are unable or unwilling are swept under the rug, to be hidden from society, almost like something shameful.
I wouldn't put any faith at all in what our PM says. I trust him as much as I can fly. There just too much fluffy talk and too little real action by our dear leader. He has an alibino son, have you ever hear him speak about his son or even be seen together. His son is pratically buried under the same rug.
I have a close friend who is a volenteer at AWWA and the condition of the school is beyond belief. The school is practically a abandoned primary schools from the 70s. No lift and/or another disable facilities at all, considering this is a school for disabled children, many of whom have physicals disablities.
Like I said, too much fluffy talk and too little concrete action.
Time to reconsider if this place is the right and proper place where you want Faith to grow up... if this place is the place where Faith can live with dignity and respect when she is grown up.
Will you be able to take care of her forever?
Posted by: SE&F | Nov 23, 2004 12:42:56 PM
This post of yours has opened up my eyes. I never realized this.
Posted by: cowboy caleb | Nov 23, 2004 1:32:16 PM
mr brown, I full empathise with you and know exactly what you are going through. My younger brother, too, will probably be regarded as a "burden" to society. He has a mental illness; he's an NS reject and because he has not served NS, employers are suspicious of him and do not employ him.
The government treats special people like my brother and your daughter as if they are the peripheral of society (i.e. not economically productive). For many years, he had been shuttled with my poor mom (single parent) and me from one institute to another in a desperate attempt to have him diagnosed and treated. It was only in his late teens that he was formally diagnosed. By then, my mom was already exhausted from having to deal with a child she couldn't understand for almost 20 years.
Mental illness is treated as a MEDICAL problem - thus it's MOH's pasal. For some reason, MCDS (now MCYS) sees no role in making lives of mental illness patients better. How about some educational campaigns to lessen stigma against special people (like telling the media to stop propogating the "mad person=killer" stereotype)? Or similar campaigns like the Yellow Ribbon Project?
The IMH, to its credit, is now implementing programs in order to improve its patient's quality of life. But afterall, IMH is a hospital, not a social service centre.
And need I mention the cost of medication and how overworked the psychiatrists and psychologists are? New medicines are not subsidised; if you want subdised medicine, be prepared for some really nasty side effects. In fact old medicines should not be prescribed at all but for people who have no money, they have no choice.
Reality - people are treated as economic production units. All these attempts to get people to bear more children yada yada is really to lessen the burden on the government when our generation grows old. We collect massive amount of taxes and are sitting on a pile of money but can't increase the budget of community service and special education by 1 more percent.
One reason why my husband (budak) and I will not have children is because of my brother. I love him so much and I don't want to have kids to distract me from caring for him. My mom's fear is that no one will care for him once she's gone. I almost cried when I told her not to worry, I'll never abandon my brother.
*chokes*
Posted by: Eveline How | Nov 23, 2004 2:06:13 PM
gosh, this post left me speechless and emotional.
may those scouring the net,tracking for dissidents read this - not that this message anti-establishment or the like; this is a real call from our society.
To the guys advocating an open, inclusive society, I'll say this: you want feedback from the people? Listen & respond to this.
Posted by: miss diva | Nov 23, 2004 2:15:06 PM
We all read those ridiculous propaganda which the local media spews so very often of how much we have grown from a tiny fishing village to a metropolitan hub thanks to the great foresight and planning of our ‘great leaders’.
Is ignoring the disabled community who cannot pay taxes or contribute regularly to the economy all part of the great foresight and planning……..?
Is it a case of ‘he who cannot contribute effectively/positively to accumulating wealth is not worth a nanosecond of my time’…..?
Posted by: Jaded | Nov 23, 2004 4:26:13 PM
Mr Brown, thanks for sharing and I fully empathise with you and Eveline. Same case, my sister was a difficult child throwing much tantrums and slow in learning. She was labelled as stupid when she was failing since pri 1 to 6 and could not get into a Sec school and was shoved to ITE. It was only much later when she was properly diagnosed and was put on waiting list to APSN(Assoc for Persons with Special Needs). It was a long 2 years wait before she got in and praise God she learnt much and is now working in a cafe. The money earned is not the issue but its giving her a chance to interact with the society and to see beyond the four walls of our house. Today she can go to work on her own and back home and is even able to buy things home for us. She is also definitely much more open and communicative.
Today, there is much awareness of people with special needs and more avenues to seek help than before. Of course more can be done.
www.disability.org.sg is a good portal for information and resources on disabilities. MCYS has also produced cd-roms catered to caregivers of children with special needs(autism, disabilities) to help them understand and guide them. They are available at special schools or enquire with MCYS.
Posted by: Ms Snooze | Nov 23, 2004 4:31:49 PM
Thanks for this post, dude. And that's why me and my colleagues don't turn kids and parents away when they want to give our classes a shot. One hour of extra alertness isn't much compared to that mother's trauma.
Posted by: Mr Miyagi | Nov 23, 2004 4:50:25 PM
My sister is a paediatric occupational therapist and i sincerely believe she has dedicated her life to helping children with such disabilities. i think no matter how much work she do, theres more work to be done and there simply need to be more aid for children and adults with special needs! On top of that, I remember her telling me that there are so many various reasons for why there are MANY children who do not receive help, cannot afford help or one thing or another.
personally, im just upset that people have begin to look at them as nothing more than a charitable cause due to all the celebrity donation shows but there is absolutely no integration for them into society. but whatever i say, i know i am guilty for not doing more. i know i can never be completely able to relate with this until one day i have my own children but even with my limited expereience, i know how difficult things are.
all of you have my utmost admiration
Posted by: eskie | Nov 23, 2004 5:19:49 PM
my brother is autistic and his behavior pattern is similar to the boy mentioned in the post. if some part of his pattern is disrupted, he will be distraught and will definately do something about it. But he often does it in a disruptive and violent way.
My brother's now 22. He went to Dover court when he was young but my parents paid through the noses for it. However, my mum said it was all worth it. However, he turned 16 and had to leave Dover Court.
For 3 years, my brother stayed at home. Doing pretty much nothing except to watch tv and the traffic go by. We took him out but somehow we felt that something was lacking.
AYC finally took him in after much persuasion by my persistant mother. However they kicked him out after 3 years when he turned 21. Hence my brother went back to the same cycle again of watching tv and the world go by.
He is not happy and so am I. Children like Faith can go to school but many do not realise that they is nothing much for autistic adults. No centre, no help, no support. I went from insitutions to centres but was always rejected.
I wish you and ur family all the best and I do hope if anyone has any information about centres for autistic adults, please do pass it to me. Thank you and god bless.
Posted by: Amy | Nov 23, 2004 7:17:43 PM
Thank you for this post
Posted by: gnesha | Nov 23, 2004 10:51:31 PM
thanks for quoting me, mr brown. but i don't exactly 'deal with the deaf'.. i would prefer to say i work with the deaf, heh. in fact, i am deaf myself. (i'm a special education teacher who teaches primary school deaf kids.)
i believe we need to advocate and create more public awareness and support for this cause. now, i don't mean a militant approach, but a reasoned, fact-based stand.. which is the only one our 'pragmatic, realistic' govt would even listen to anyway.
here's an example. i wrote this letter which was published in the ST forum on 2nd Oct 2004, ie. early last month.
till now, there has been total silence from MOE, MCYS, NCSS etc. why, when the issues i brought up practically cry out for a reply/clarification?
and i feel this is something we can work together on, especially the more articulate and well-read ones among us, like mr brown. every bit of concrete reasoning as well as the more 'emotional' factor of public sentiment counts.
"IT WAS with great pleasure and not a little surprise that I learnt that the issue of the education of special-needs children has been in the spotlight ('$220m school aid for disabled kids'; ST, Sept 19, and 'Teachers get special needs training'; ST, Sept 24).
This is indeed welcome and long-awaited news to the special-education (Sped) community as well as families with special-needs members. I am very heartened to know that, in keeping with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's pledge, the Government is now giving more attention and aid to students with special needs.
As a special-education teacher and person with disability (deafness) myself, I would like to offer my views on this issue.
I am concerned that in the afterglow of the announcement of such generous measures for special-needs children, both the Government and the man in the street would conclude that the issue of insufficient support for them is now a non-issue, which is not so.
We face some crucial, unresolved issues with regard to educational policies which impact adversely on special-needs children.
Firstly, special-needs children are still exempted from compulsory education. The decision as to whether to enrol these children in school lies solely with their parents, which is in glaring contrast to legislation providing for compulsory education for 'normal' children.
I would like to point out that most children with disabilities, however severe, have the capability and potential to learn academic or vocational skills, and contribute to society and the economy. But this is possible only if they are given the chance to.
Failing to ensure that all children with disabilities get a quality education would only lead to them wallowing in a state of dependency and helplessness and, in the long run, becoming a greater economic burden to society as uneducated, untrained, unemployable adults.
Secondly, Sped schools are still managed and run by voluntary welfare organisations (VWOs) instead of the Ministry of Education (MOE). This is clearly not ideal as most VWOs are perpetually struggling for funds and resources to run their programmes. The current woeful state of facilities in some Sped schools says it all. Sped teachers also lag far behind their mainstream counterparts in terms of training and upgrading opportunities, professional status and, last but not least, pay.
However, the Government seems very resistant to the notion of putting Sped schools under MOE, which is rather puzzling. Education for special-needs children is an educational issue, not a 'charity' or 'community development' or 'voluntary work' issue. (Of course, the VWOs will still have a role to play in working with MOE in providing social, financial and job-matching support for individual clients).
Making MOE responsible for running Sped schools should not be seen as diverting funds from mainstream schools and a misallocation of resources, as seems to be the perception of the authorities.
Neither is giving Sped schools a status on par with mainstream schools a case of going down the slippery slope to welfarism.
True, the cost of running an average Sped school (based on expenditure per student) would be higher than for an average mainstream school, due to the need for specialised staff, equipment and facilities.
However, we need to keep in mind that these are not luxuries, but essential expenditure on educational services which Sped children should be entitled to, being every bit as Singaporean as their mainstream peers, not second-class citizens.
In view of the above and at the risk of sounding ungracious and ungrateful, I would like to say I feel that an additional $55 million annually for four years is but a short-term measure. What happens after that?
On the other hand, enforcing compulsory education for special-needs children and putting special education in its rightful place - under MOE where it will be guaranteed sufficient funding, teaching expertise, institutional support and resources year after year, over the long run - will make the real and lasting difference."
Posted by: le petit prince | Nov 23, 2004 11:57:22 PM
amy,
have you tried approaching autism resource centre? although their clientele consists mainly of children and teens, i understand that they do provide services for adults with autism as well. if i'm not wrong, they try and give priority to adult clients as there are no services for this group elsewhere as yet. you can check out their website at www.autism.org.sg for contact details.
Posted by: jubilee | Nov 24, 2004 11:23:16 AM
Thank you Mr Brown, and all of you. I have learnt something very very insightful. And these scenarios will stay with me. I confess I have almost lost my faith to offer prayers for anything in particular but for you people, I will. God Bless.
Posted by: inarticulate | Nov 25, 2004 9:43:01 AM
I was tearing by the end of the post, especially after reading the mother's sms.
The last time I went past Margaret Drive special school I felt a little disheartened - it was still tiny compared to the schools around the area - and just because they aren't "normal" kids, it doesn't mean they should be deprived of an education or care.
I wonder if it's because of the culture that it is the way it is.
:\
Posted by: jeanz | Nov 25, 2004 9:58:13 AM
Jubilee,
Thanks =)
Amy
Posted by: Amy | Nov 26, 2004 6:30:03 PM
I have a crystal-clear memory from my primary school days. One time in Primary Two my Chinese teacher was displeased with one homework that my entire class did badly in, and she shouted (in English): "If you all continue like this you will all end up in that [name deleted] Special School across the road!"
I was in a prestigious primary school, the kind that parents queue up for hours to appeal to the principal for their darlings to get in. The special school was always within sight of our road crossing. The sliproad leading to our schools would frequently be full of expensive cars with parents and chauffers dropping off their little princes, all of whom would snobbishly snub their little noses in that direction and strut into the school gates.
Americans, for all their faults, try their best to value diversity, even if it comes in the guise of children with special needs. Schooling in the US has given me a deeper perspective into the lives of the handicapped, people that Singaporeans pretend don't exist, yet Americans go all the way to ease the mundane things in life for them.
I can proudly claim that every face of every building in my school (or at least those that I frequent) has at least one wheelchair-accessible ramp and powered door. And that I once spent $25 to rent a wheelchair for a day during a charitable exercise in my university to experience first-hand how life bound to a wheelchair is like.
Will try to flesh out the idea on my blog when I get round to it.
Posted by: Acidflask | Nov 28, 2004 8:05:07 AM
I was a Special Education teacher for about 6 years teaching students with Autism. Currently, I am a Child Life Therapist working with children with chronic illnesses. These are jobs that creates the humane me.
In comparison, to our neighbouring countries, we are in much more better position than them. We have to stop dwelling on what our country can't do for these Special beings but what we can do for them.
They have taught me to be a HUMANE me. Teach THEM and THEY will teach YOU. Much I have learnt from them and I thank them for the valuable lessons that they have taught me.
Posted by: Abeerah | Oct 9, 2005 11:40:32 PM














