« A village outing: Three generations shopping at Far East Plaza on a Sunday morning | Main | browncast: singapore flunks courtesy »

Monday, July 03, 2006

TODAY: S'poreans are fed, up with progress!

Up_with_progressLatest TODAY column: S'poreans are fed, up with progress!


Excerpt:

THINGS are certainly looking up for Singapore again. Up, up, and away.

Household incomes are up, I read. Sure, the bottom third of our country is actually seeing their incomes (or as one newspaper called it, "wages") shrink, but the rest of us purportedly are making more money.

Okay, if you say so.

As sure as Superman Returns, our cost of living is also on the up. Except we are not able to leap over high costs in a single bound.

Cost of watching World Cup is up. Price of electricity is up. Comfort's taxi fares are going up. Oh, sorry, it was called "being revised". Even the prata man at my coffeeshop just raised the price of his prata by 10 cents. He was also revising his prata prices.

So Singaporeans need to try to "up" their incomes, I am sure, in the light of our rising costs. Have you upped yours?



----------
Full column:


S'poreans are fed, up with progress!


THINGS are certainly looking up for Singapore again. Up, up, and away.

Household incomes are up, I read. Sure, the bottom third of our country is actually seeing their incomes (or as one newspaper called it, "wages") shrink, but the rest of us purportedly are making more money.

Okay, if you say so.

As sure as Superman Returns, our cost of living is also on the up. Except we are not able to leap over high costs in a single bound.

Cost of watching World Cup is up. Price of electricity is up. Comfort's taxi fares are going up. Oh, sorry, it was called "being revised". Even the prata man at my coffeeshop just raised the price of his prata by 10 cents. He was also revising his prata prices.

So Singaporeans need to try to "up" their incomes, I am sure, in the light of our rising costs. Have you upped yours?

We are very thankful for the timing of all this good news, of course. Just after the elections, for instance. By that I mean that getting the important event out of the way means we can now concentrate on trying to pay our bills.

It would have been too taxing on the brain if those price increases were announced during the election period, thereby affecting our ability to choose wisely.

The other reason I am glad with the timing of the cost of living increases and wages going down, is that we can now deploy our Progress Package to pay for some of these bills.

Wait, what? You spent it all on that fancy pair of shoes on the day you saw your money in your account? Too bad for you then.

As I break into my Progress Package reserves to see if it is enough to pay the bills, I feel an overwhelming sense of progress. I feel like I am really staying together with my fellow Singaporeans and moving forward.

There is even talk of future roads like underground expressways being outsourced to private sector companies to build, so that they, in turn, levy a toll on those of us who use these roads.

I understand the cost of building these roads is high, and the Government is relooking the financing of these big road projects.

Silly me, I thought my road tax and COE was enough to pay for public roads.

Maybe we can start financing all kinds of expensive projects this way in future. We could build upgraded lifts for older HDB blocks, and charge tolls on a per use basis.

You walk into your new lift on the first floor, and the scanner reads the contactless cashcard chip embedded in your forehead. This chip would be part of the recently-announced Intelligent Nation 2015 plan, you know, that initiative to make us a smart nation?

So you, the smart contactless-cashcard-chip-enhanced Singaporean would go into your lift, and when you get off at your floor, the lift would deduct the toll from your chip, and you would hear a beep.

The higher you live, the more expensive the lift toll.

Now you know why I started climbing stairs for exercise, as I mentioned in my last column. I plan to prepare for that day when I have to pay to use my lift. God help you if some kid presses all the lift buttons in the lift, as kids are wont to do. You will be beeping all the way to your flat.

The same chip could be used to pay for supermarket items. You just carry your bags of rice and groceries past the cashierless cashier counter, and the total will be deducted from your contactless cashcard automatically.

You will not even know you just got poorer. And if your contactless cashcard runs out of funds (making it a contactless CASHLESS cashcard), you just cannot use paid services.

The door of the lift won't close, the bus won't stop for you, taxis will automatically display "On Call" when their chip scanners detect you're broke.

Sure, paying bills that only seem to go up is painful, but by Jove, we are going to make sure it is at least convenient.

No more opening your wallet and fiddling with dirty notes and coins. Just stand there and hear your income beeped away. No fuss, no muss! I cannot wait to be a Smart e-Singaporean.

I also found out recently that my first-born daughter's special school fees were going up. This is because of this thing called "Means Testing", where they test your means, then if you are not poor enough, you lose some or all of the subsidy you've been getting for your special child's therapy.

I think I am looking at about a $100 increase, which is a more than a 100 per cent increase, but who's counting, right? We can afford it, but we do know many families who cannot, even those that are making more money than we are, on paper.

But don't worry. Most of you don't have this problem. Your normal kids can go to regular school for very low fees, and I am sure they will not introduce means testing for your cases.

We need your gifted and talented kids to help our country do well economically, so that our kids with special needs can get a little more therapy to help them to walk and talk. And hey, maybe if the country does really well, the special-needs kids will get a little more subsidy.

Like I said, progress.

High-definition televisions, a high-speed broadband wireless network, underground expressways, and contactless cashcard system — all our signs of progress.

I am happy for progress, of course but I would be just as happy to make ends meet and to see my autistic first-born grow up able to talk and fend for herself in this society when I am gone.

That is something my wife and I will pay all we can pay to see in our lifetimes.


mr brown is the accidental author of a popular website that has been documenting the dysfunctional side of Singapore life since 1997. He enjoys having yet another cashcard, in addition to his un-contactless one and the ez-link one to add to his wallet.

Monday, July 3, 2006 at 12:02 AM in Musings, Popular | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2139/5235747

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference TODAY: S'poreans are fed, up with progress!:

» Entertainment from Airhole
People ask me what I do for entertainment nowadays. You like CSI? Maybe Desperate Housewives? Got new show coming out, called Ghost Whisperer leh, Jennifer Love Hewitt acting leh! Sadly, these lukewarm dramas are not really entertainment ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 4, 2006 12:07:38 PM

» Singapore condemns blogger for expressing opinions from Boing Boing
Geekgeek says, "mr brown" [Ed.: aka Lee Kin Mun], Singapore's most famous blogger, has been writing a weekly column for a local Singaporean newspaper called "Today". Recently, one of his columns was more anti-establishment than the powers-that-rule lik... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 6, 2006 10:06:18 AM

» Brown-out TODAY from e pur si muove
Who didnt see this coming? mrbrown just mentioned how his column at TODAY has been suspended, after his latest column precipitated a vitriolic response from MICA. What was the famous column about? The title Sporeans are fed, up wi... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 6, 2006 10:51:43 AM

» A new low. from jim's backlogs
this resulted in this, causing this.... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2006 1:38:14 AM

» Blogger criticado por expressar a sua opinião from e-direito.com
Lee Kin Mun, mais conhecido como mr brown, é o autor de um dos mais populares blogues de Singapura. De tal modo que o jornal diário Today, propriedade do grupo Mediacorp Press, parcialmente controlado pelo Estado, o convidou para escrever uma coluna ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2006 3:55:11 AM

» Propaganda Department's New Branch from Letters from China
Singapore UPDATE 1:Singaporean Nanny bans mr brown's subversive column; Asia Pundit is calling on a Four Million (Middle) Fingers campaign to celebrate the resolute action. * * * Singaporean government gives mr brown a lecture on writing commentary:mr ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2006 12:27:28 PM

» links for 2006-07-07 from medmusings
mrbrown gets canned for this post: L'infantile terrible of Singapore: TODAY: S'poreans are fed, up with progress! (tags: singapore politics blogger) PAMF eHealthNews: SMA (shared medical appointments), EHR, Fremont (tags: PAMF newsletter) Steven R. La... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2006 2:18:49 PM

» Bloggers in Singapore from James Seng's Blog
It started with a innocently with a usual humor piece by mrbrown titled S'poreans are fed, up with progress! on his weekly Friday column on Tod [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 10, 2006 6:48:27 PM

» Singaporean Bloggers from jckchung
Singaporean Bloggers Muzzled? [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 11, 2006 7:17:48 PM

» Relentlessly criticize Mr. Brown from Imagethief
This page would like to congratulate the government of Singapore for taking prompt action to rein in... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 12, 2006 12:14:39 PM

» At least we're not Singapore part 237,402 from Simon World
While it's easy to get carried away with the lamentable state of media in Hong Kong, we must always remember one thing: at least we're not in Singapore. Mr Brown is a popular Singaporean blogger and newspaper columnist. He's been writing for over 10 ye... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 14, 2006 2:48:29 PM

» Rising Prices and Widening Income Gap from All and Sundry Singapore
The onslaught of globalisation has caused many who are older, unemployed, less educated and less privileged to become the states rising disenchanted in an environment of rising costs and widening income gap. [Read More]

Tracked on Nov 20, 2007 2:52:26 PM

Comments

thanks for say what all of us are thinking - and feeling! things are going up and living in singapore is getting more and more ridiculous for so many of us. Is higher cost going to better family life and encourage more couples to have kids? no way hose!

Posted by: dragon | Jul 3, 2006 12:09:14 AM

wonder why couldnt they have saved that progress package and use it to offset these rising costs? this kind of progress package- seems to come with a heavy price.

Posted by: mystery | Jul 3, 2006 12:12:42 AM

It is more apparent now than ever, I am so disillusioned?

I hope they will not consider me a quitter, should i decide to pack and leave this place i call home

Posted by: sodium | Jul 3, 2006 1:09:11 AM

don't worry endure abit more for the next election and all the wonderful news and ang bao will come along your way again.

Hopefully by then everyone isn't that forgetful and remember to give them a nice grade for all the good times ahead!

Grade F should be good; F, f**king well done!

Posted by: astroboy | Jul 3, 2006 1:34:38 AM

That was a brilliant column! Disguised attack on the government.. They should be ashamed of themselves. Children with special needs don't even have to pay school fees in some first world countries unlike us..

Posted by: jep | Jul 3, 2006 3:28:30 AM

Just read the reply from MITA about this article. It is amazing how arrogant the gahmen can be, even when citizens tell them what they are unhappy about. Typical reply, come up with a solution or shut up. Isn't that why we pay the ministers big bucks for? To come up with solutions that we meer mortals cannot. Furthermore, even if we do come up with good ideas, are we ever listened to? It seems the gahmen only 'hears' us when we 'talk bad' about them.

Not only does the reply show how out of touch they are with the people, it also shows how much they know about blogs and mr brown.

If a 'serious' newspaper cannot publish what the lay people are talking about, then what can they publish? Only good things the gahmen is doing? So it is okay that Singaporeans are unhappy with certain things, but it is NOT okay to voice them?

Progressive country? We mind as well go back to the middle ages where everything is controlled.

Posted by: Desmond Lim | Jul 3, 2006 7:22:25 AM

brilliant piece of writing that gives voice to the common man. hope more people see the light as a result.

Posted by: bt | Jul 3, 2006 10:34:16 AM

if only 0.79million saw the light... =)

Posted by: zhihao | Jul 3, 2006 11:07:08 AM

I rate this article B - for BALLS!

Posted by: cynicole | Jul 3, 2006 11:36:37 AM

hmmm..quite natural when in a situation of A Progress everything else oso 'Progresses' yes? same with cost la..
I do wish certain items were cheaper esp medical for kids.
when my 2nd one was 1 plus I had quit my job so I naturally cut down on all my expenses cos less 1 person's income :(...
....So, I bot cheaper milk pwder! and even saw GP instead of expensive bb doctor!..All was and is kewl la (I wish I had spent less before). think v shud focus on what needs to be done in any new situations and adjust accordingly..yes?

Posted by: kuching | Jul 3, 2006 12:32:19 PM

Just do not forget, fellow Singaporeans, when the next GE comes.

I hope Mr Brown doesn't get into trouble.

I hope TODAY doesn't sanction him.

I hope TODAY doesn't get into trouble.

Posted by: Kenny Lim | Jul 3, 2006 1:48:42 PM

Does means testing also apply to the PAP ministers?

I would be really intersted to know what they are supposed to pay for their medical attention, and school fees, and utility bills when means testing is applied to them.

They're the biggest money sucking resources in the country anyway, the system should recognise them as such.

Posted by: Kenny Lim | Jul 3, 2006 1:52:33 PM

Kenny, they get it free through making you pay more when the hikes come.

Meaning, they are the lucky ones whose income got higher and higher while you're the 30% who got smaller and smaller wages.

Means testing only means that they are testing if this avenue is going to generate more income for them. COE not contributing much now because people can choose not to buy a car. But ahh, everyone will be sick one day mah! solid revenue growth and great ROI.

Then, one fine day, those pesky Singaporeans will learn to die off conveniently (as one high flying diplomat wished) to avoid medical bills. Don't know about this? Read gayle's confrontation with Kausikan for a better appreciation of these great minds running the administration.

Posted by: mada | Jul 3, 2006 2:59:15 PM

I never spend the progress package given to me, cos' I know everything will go up after the election. Boy am I right.

If only I am as good at guessing 4D or Toto.

Posted by: progress | Jul 3, 2006 3:05:14 PM

Having only become a Singaporean quite recently, I must confess that I found this particular thread rather funny actually... and strangely familiar.

I grew up in London and spent just about all my time complaining about how expensive everything was. My parents complained about the cost of my education at a private girl's school (there was no way they were going to send me to a government-run 'comprehensive school' where being able to read was a purely optional skill). When I grew up, I complained about the cost of my apartment, the cost of transport (and the perpetually annoying tube strikes that caused early morning chaos) and the whole cost of living in general.

And, the government never seemed to do anything about it. Well, not really anyway. There were a great many speeches made, points discussed and issues pursued of course. The newspapers were full of it. Every talk show and interview programme ranted on about it. And every blog buzzed with it. But, in the end, it all pretty much came to naught time and again. Prices still rose (together with taxes), disposable incomes still fell and everyone felt like shit.

So, basically you have my sympathies... And I do honestly hope that one day, Sinagporeans (being the clever, 'progressive' people they are) will be able to fix these problems where a poor refugee from the 'First World' (i.e. me) has failed.

Posted by: Caroline | Jul 3, 2006 3:16:37 PM

Caroline! Welcome to Singapore....

Posted by: Dragonknight | Jul 3, 2006 4:07:31 PM

Caroline, you are so lucky to be here!

In Singapore, we have a wonderful team of politicians who are very good at fixing our problems. But, first, we must give them the solutions.

Also, while your first world country allows all to blog and make speeches,(got TV shows and interviews!), we need to join a party to talk about the rising cost of living. I am now currently looking for a glam party to join. WP sound so worker types and I am so glam. Not quite my kind of image. I hope they have a Vogue party or something like the Desperate Housewives party.

I am glad you find it funny but please keep that to yourself. Humour is not encouraged in Singapore. I am predicting that we might be caned if seen laughing at jokes, someday. But, it is OK to smile to tourists and IBF officials.

Follow these basic rules and you'll enjoy more good years here. Keep enjoying the Swiss standard of living in Singapore!

Maybe you could persuade more of your fellow countrymen to come here too. We love foreigners here. Kisses and hugs.

Posted by: aunty xinjiabo | Jul 3, 2006 8:22:28 PM

Tolls expected on expressway....It is just a pre-ample to Singaporean

Thought the outsourcing anything should reduce cost so that things should be cheaper for normal folks....

Why are we paying more??????? So what is the point of outsourcing???
outsourcing = reducing in cost???

We are all leaving in the strange world when logically things should be getting cheaper with outsourcing but it looking likewise....

Going to catch SUPERMAN soon.... UP UP and AWAY

Posted by: Puzzled | Jul 3, 2006 10:45:35 PM

that's y its call Progress Package...it provides an excuse for the gar-verment to Progress their own Package.... ;p

Posted by: guizai | Jul 3, 2006 11:02:26 PM

You must really be hurting to write something like that.

Anyway, I just have one question to Mr. Bhavani's reply: What serious newspaper?

Posted by: Recent Runes | Jul 4, 2006 12:09:34 AM

Dear Mr Brown,

I applaud your bravery and honesty in sharing the heart of us 'common people' out there.

Posted by: Dewy Poch | Jul 4, 2006 12:59:11 AM

Frankly speaking, I think one reason why the Government seems to be so slow on providing for our needs is due to a generally underrepresented population.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not endorsing Mr Chee's(SDP) brash, reckless style of attacking the government but it seems to me that Singaporeans seem more content to just complain among themselves instead of being proactive and doing something about it. Take some of these comments that just shout out about how bad the government is. If there's a problem, find a possible solution and put it forward. If you think that the Government is overpaid and underworked, give them
something to think about! I do appreciate however, what bloggers like Mr Brown and Mr Miyagi are doing to help the stir up activity on the local scene.

As to Mr Bhavani's response, I think that he comes off as a politician with insufficient clout to back his own ideas forced to give a politically correct answer. As to his comment about people with access to mass media becoming partisan players in politics, I think he chooses to forget that alot of things are politics or are partly political in nature. Constructive critiscisms or a lack of dissent is also a show of support for the government. It all depends on
perceptions.

Also, Caroline, being, relatively speaking, an outsider to Singapore, could you share with us your impressions of the government here?

Just what I think (hopefully I put it across properly). I'll gladly accept corrections if I'm wrong.

Posted by: invisible signboard | Jul 4, 2006 1:23:36 AM

LOL! Like the taxi with 'on call' sign part!

Posted by: noname | Jul 4, 2006 9:59:18 AM

I know that I'm going to alarm and possibly offend a lot of people here, but I must confess that as a brand new Singaporean, I've found the government to be (ironically) highly representative of the people they represent.

In my preparations to becoming a true blue Singaporean, I spent a great deal of time reading the newspapers and listening to the ramblings of my husband's assorted relatives (many Singaporean aunties, uncles and cousins) and I discovered 2 wonderous qualities that they all seemed to share:
(1) they hate being critised; and
(2) they don't think it's polite to make others 'lose face', i.e. don't disagree with people in public.

As a result, they were always very touchy when I disgreed with them on anything and I was told (more than once) by my mother-in-law (and now my colleagues too) not to disagree with people so much.... at least not in public. I was told time and again that it's not good to be so 'argumentative', though in my defense I tried to explain that I wasn't actually arguing but merely trying to put across my point of view politely (no raised voices here). And if no one agreed with me, I was perfectly okay with that but that the supression of all dissenting points of view altogether was hardly constructive to the growth of any company. Basically, it should be fine to disagree.

Government 'knee jerk' reponses (i.e. to be highly offended and possibly even shocked) to any form of public criticism (in any form of public broadcast media) is in many ways merely a more obvious manifestation of this behaviour. It is sad to be sure, but I honestly don't find it very surprising.

I am happy though that more and more Singaporeans are becoming more open to the idea that there is nothing wrong with debate, discussion and disagreement. No society can be completely homogeneous and to expect an incredibly diverse population like Singapore's to be so is absurd. To agree to disagree is the first sign that we are becoming more mature, more understanding and more thoughtful about how we are and who we want to be.

Posted by: Caroline | Jul 4, 2006 12:15:28 PM

Just remember this: most singaporean are trained to listen to our superior(aka gahment), starting from Primary school, sec sch...NS (for males)...etc, so it is no surprise that the gahment is pissed when someone falls out of line. Listen to them, heed their advise, and you will be left alone...not too poor....not rich enuf either. Fall out of line, and you will be critised, outcasted, sued, framed, be-littled, and your income tax returned checked to the cents...so all those who posted in this board....beware...because you have fall out of line (incl me)...haha

Posted by: doggie | Jul 4, 2006 2:17:27 PM

then it was the Cat Lim affair, now, it's the Mr Brown affair.
e riot act has been read, the OB markers redrawn in bold
and double the size.
but dat's always how e cookie crumbles in this silly-con city.
build e durian, bring in e one-arm bandits n co. etc, it's still
the Animal Farm at the core.

so y bother?

Posted by: sheikh tan | Jul 4, 2006 4:21:26 PM

And also remember, by constantly reinforcing the message that Singaporeans are "trained to listen to our superiors", we will never break out of this loop. The government cannot prevent it if more and more people decide to think for themselves and will be forced to listen. If enough people get together, a strong force can be born to regalvanise Singapore and make it a vibrant. As the equation goes, Force = mass * acceleration. Given enough people and willpower, the government will be forced to sit up and listen to what it's people has to say.

Thanks caroline, I never really thought about it that way, heh.

Posted by: invisible signboard | Jul 4, 2006 4:31:39 PM

If Mr Brown were supposed to write "academic" articles, why bother? Mr Brown is part of the vox populi and his views reflect that. It is the slice of real life that we want. And the reality is that people are emotional creatures and respond emotionally to things that affect them. The usual cheap shot of "put up (a solution) or shut up" is meaningless and smacks of defensiveness. And the pseudonym crack is so pathetic, it's almost hilarious. Yeah Mr Brown, don't hide behind your pseudonym! Heck, you're probably more well known than K Bhavani. If the title "press sec to MICA" was not there, would we even know who he/she is?

Posted by: Locolobo | Jul 4, 2006 7:47:31 PM

Hi mb,

Everyone in the world is entitled their views, not just Singaporeans. Speaking out is good and I also think that a good feedback is not necessarily one with solution, but one that points out the problem in an objective way demonstrating why some things won't work and if possible, provide options, at least a constructive way on how you would like your problem to be dealt with.

I feel that the views expressed in that article “S'poreans are fed, up with progress!” should be kept to a blog or forum. “Negative ranting” is the impression I get after reading the article.

As a very popular blogger and columnist, your views will and have in fact influenced many others reading your article. I mean to say, many people value your views and love the way you express your views.

As such, I feel that you have a social responsibility when you write something in a newspaper, even a gossip paper when it concerns the government policies and campaigns. Like making a joke out of the IT plan, is it a fair comment? Would the policy not lead to a possibility of Singaporean’s progress?

However, if such things are discussed in a blog or forum, it’s only a casual talk and everyone is free to rant and write what you think in a somber or sour manner, anyway you like, sometimes people just enjoy being mean.

But I do have to thank you for bring up the issues on the rising cost of living. Nobody likes prices to be raised, me included. And I also do not like the way price increases is “given” to us, we never have a choice, every kind of major life needs is supplied by a monopoly here. Maybe I should consider cycling to work, hope I don’t have to pay road tax for that.

As for the progress package, well, we all lived in Singapore long enough to understand that we are not entitled to welfare, we have to support ourselves (whether one is old, poor, sick or insane) in any case and if we are given anything by the government, the thing is only advanced partial reimbursement of the extra money one have to cough out subsequently. It has got nothing to do with the timing of the elections.

And I don't like the way K Bhavani has replied and agreed with the hundreds of comments chiding the way she handled your article. And I hope the reply Ms Bhavani has given is not a trap to label you as a person with a political agenda.

Posted by: 33 | Jul 4, 2006 9:32:58 PM

33- some would agree with you, some wouldnt. I personally didnt find this article THAT remarkable although it did echo my sentiment. But that MICA letter pissed me off. And we're here defending the right of the everyday man to rant.

Posted by: TODAY ex-reader | Jul 4, 2006 10:23:14 PM

Once saw a headline in one of Singapore's free magazine... "If voting can change things, it would be illegal".

Posted by: MB's Support | Jul 5, 2006 9:51:07 AM

Wah, the letter from MICA very fierce one. You be careful, Mr Brown. You don't play,play with politics and the gahmen. See, now you are being branded as playing partisan politics. Cham la you. They are watching you. But as an avid fan of your columns and your website, i say keep it coming. Your views are pertinent and very heartlander. Your issues are real, even your spoofs. I take it as humour with a bite. Too bad, the authorities do not have a sense of humour about it. They should really learn to lighten up.

Posted by: true princess | Jul 5, 2006 1:49:32 PM

I recall that during the election Neil Humpries , who is a non-citizen, wrote a satire about the General Elections. I understand that foriegners are not allowed to comment on Singapore issues and a number had been deported. Neil Humpries was left alone probably because his views ended with these words.." The PAP will win..."
Now Mr.Brown, a Singaporean, is getting flak for his humour. Where got justice?

Posted by: Gila | Jul 5, 2006 3:34:48 PM

keep up or ship out. that's the meaning of the progressive message here.

unfortunately, not all will benefit from the system unless you happened to form the top 20% or there about of the citizenry.

for the rests, life will be hard to maintain a first world image like carrying fakies on the outside to show you have 'arived' as a nation.

but i am not against progress per se. but i would rethink free market directed progress.

i tend to believe the time is ripe for controlled or selective progress which is kinder to lives!

when you live in the heartland and mingle with the true blue fellow singaporeans, you will understand why i am skeptical of our visions and underlining values driving this nation.

though poorer, i think we had more souls back in the kampong days than now!

less "reality tv" kind of people back then if you know what i mean!

Posted by: musing | Jul 5, 2006 6:00:41 PM

Hey, mb, you forgot a couple of other UPS that will be coming shortly.....
Ministers/Civil servants pay and GST.
You see, when prices go up, ministers and high flying civil servants like Bhavani are no different from us commoners.....their costs of living goes up too. So, they have to adequately adjust (revise) their salaries to compensate for higher cost of living. This, in turn, will cause the cost to run the ministries and public sector to go up. How to raise more revenue to cover this???? TAX the commoners with higher GST.

Furthermore...the cheek of Bhavani to suggest that you offer no solutions...now the $million ministers and $half million civil servants want us to do their jobs for them but they collect their FAT pay...or should I say wages.

Posted by: obv7 | Jul 5, 2006 6:34:58 PM

Thanks MB for pointing out the obvious.

Although not a SG'rean myself, I do empatise the situation that the SG population faces. However, S'reans like MB - being willing to stand up and vocalise their opinions are probably more rare and precious than natural blue diamonds.

Echoing Caroline's observation - I've noticed that the population here in general like to gripe and whine just abt everything. That's all - no action plan, no constructive feedback, just lots of hot air.

In addition, those few that dare to champion the rights of their fellow men will almost certainly garner no/few concrete support from the very ppl whom they were speaking on behalf of. Most often - those daring few even get slammed with criticism and labelled as "stupid" or "lousy" once the government denounces their actions publicly. (As the rest of the population either just look on.. or join in the criticism.)

All I'm trying to say is: Singaporeans get what they deserve. Unless SG'reans actually learn to stand up for what they believe in and take constructive action - 3 yrs in the future will be no different from now. History will just repeat itself.

If finances are such a huge concern for the SG govt - perhaps you'd all "subtly" suggest to your dear ministers to take a 20% paycut. I'm sure a little sacrifice on their side is not beyond their fulfilment.

So if the SG'reans among you are done ranting about the social injustices on MB's comment page - do yourself a favour and ask yourself: "How can I make myself heard?".

P/s: Pls choose non-illegal and non-violent means.

Posted by: sophia | Jul 5, 2006 10:08:15 PM

Two questions related to Caroline+Sophia's postings:

(1) How much are garhmen officials paid in London? The mantra of NWC is "wages must lag behind productivity". I suppose "productivity" means providing solutions?

(2) If we can provide all the solutions, then why don't we switch places and wages with the garhmen and let them provide the hot air instead?

Posted by: Mr X | Jul 6, 2006 12:09:56 AM

I don't play partisan politics or garment politics....but rather layman politics.

What is layman politics?

Rant and Rant, and spam the media with all the unhappiness with the price increases, govt ministers get more pay, lousy upgrading, no upgrading and also high handed govt reply to layman's problems.

politicans politics all talk and when action, army and plice are used. partisan politics- come on, when this is in effect, PAP no more liao...

Posted by: layman | Jul 6, 2006 12:15:18 AM

bring it on.. sarcasm with wit, with subtle (n some not so subtle) points n shots well taken, but with a strong point to bring across..

Posted by: law stuent | Jul 6, 2006 12:40:05 AM

caroline- thank you - despite being new to Singapore (?)- you are here reading and discussing whats good for Singapore. Thats very cool. For many of us who are born in Singapore- we love it too much to leave so easily despite the problems. We wanna stay to make it work and blogs like these help us discuss what can make singapore better.

Posted by: fancl | Jul 6, 2006 12:47:35 AM

Still on the productivity issue... counted in Singapore (peanut) dollars -- our PM is paid 3 peanuts vs 0.6 for US President and 0.5 for UK Prime Minister, so that makes him at least 5 times better paid.
http://www.mrbrown.com/blog/singapore_national_education/index.html

Hmm... while i'm sure Mr Bush and Mr Blair are drawing only a small fraction of their entrepreneur peers' income, I'm not so sure if their little paycheck is eroding their integrity or their ability to multitask (i.e. real issues and pesky opposition).
I'm sure our garhmen solutions are brilliant and ingenious, coz we adopt best international practices (from UK and US of course) and ask citizens to provide solutions!

Posted by: Mr X | Jul 6, 2006 1:11:43 AM

The government is right. Mr Brown does not give solution or alternative and keep giving B.S to lot of people. He has nothing to offer to help the government.

The truth you say now is threatening the lifehood of those MP. You can joke anything but not their job security and their pay. If you are one of them, whose don't ?

So Mr Brown, I have come up a new solution that might help you. Encourage everyone to groom their children to become MP and Singapore's future leaders.

The following is the reason why:

1) You get pay unheard of. So much that it is shrouded in secrecy.

2) In bad times, the other workers will have pay cut, whereas the MP will have it increase. The rich get richer and poor get poorer. Because the operation cost increase, bus fare increase, adn GST increase... etc... All this become profit in ministor's pay.

3) Imagine in bad times, can earn so much. Then in good times, my eyes will popup if I see their salary slips.

4) MP propose measurement that claim to solve the problem but rely on PayAndPay (PAP) scheme that sure to make $$$$$$. One , it solve problem because $$$ come out of the public's pocket. Two, it increase profit, because it charge per entry. Look at ERP, to solve congest, increase the toll fee la. So more $$$ come in la. This type of scheme even a cuckoo can even think of it, why pay MP so much $$$ ? Just hire some cuckoo for few hundreds can think up these ideas fast. At best, there is conflict of interest.

5) You are always right, and protected by these reason.
Reason 1:
"Due to globalization, the cost of living is increasing. So be adaptable and flexible. Be cuckoo and so be it. Remember, be flexible and adaptable."

Reason 2:
"Dont talk so much, give me a solution. If not, then I continue the "money-making scheme" la."

6) the more sweet talk you can give to the public, the higher and faster you climb. Just keep the negative out and positive going. And the positive will become from raw to expensive peanut for you.

7) If anyone tried to compare you with other country foreign policy and critize you. Just say this magic words and it will cure you of anything.
"We are a different kind of country so require different kind of policy and management. So don't compare other "peanut" with apple. We are different league.

So government, what the solution for you.
Well, first, the pay you give to MP end up in complacency and conflict of interest. You have money-making business that disconnected with the society and more into business. To think that you can run a government with a money-making scheme is arrogant itself.

So why don't you give the MP $2000 each month, and still see if they supported the goverment a year later. Whose know, some will even join opposition party and become white collar worker.

Hi, I love Singapore, but I does not love the fact that we are treated a fool and tool to make $$$ for others.

So much as being uncovered by blogger and news through internet that I started feeling disgusted by thing done to Singapore.

If they continue to get disconnected with public, sooner or later, the country will end up with new name: Sinkapond.

Government, please love the people as you did in 1965. The very people that support you and the older generation. Don't disappointed just because you have short-termism. You don'
t make promise in the election doesn't mean you are not accountable anymore. You still get pay and perceived as leader. Wakeup and become Singaporean again. Not elitism.

Posted by: noman | Jul 6, 2006 6:38:59 AM

Ever hear of educated idiots? We have one here. Insensitive. Progress package to help cope with higher living costs? Crap. So progress actually comes with a price? Bring it on MRB! U are speaking up for a couple million of people!

Posted by: 92 | Jul 6, 2006 11:19:54 AM

I've to say - when will S'poreans wake up! S'pore Govt is definitely scared to lose! Lose wat? Their political power of course! Remember sometime 2 wks (or more) ago, LSL went to NZ, he mentioned that it re-affirms his mindset to have S'pore administer under 1 party system in political arena, after seeing NZ's political system! These are all crap! He all along wants a 1 party system, but using NZ as an excuse!

Posted by: brown supporter | Jul 6, 2006 4:25:17 PM

noman - you should groom yourself to be a politician! you are definitely 1 of their kind!

Posted by: brown supporter | Jul 6, 2006 4:31:46 PM

read ur "Singaporeans are fed, up with progress" article. Totally agree!!! I have saved for years to get a 4room hdb cos middle income cannot buy 3room mah. Not poor to buy 3 room, not rich to buy condo. TOO BAD.

Then save save save, suddenly price of HDB went up, all resalers like AH LONG, now cannot buy already. So much for the start your family, have more children, im turning 30 soon and no house, by the time got house, my womb too weak liao lolz. It hard.. being singaporean.

Posted by: ivy | Jul 6, 2006 6:26:34 PM

Hey dude. Chin up. Try working in Donald Fagen's IGY into the next blog. What a wonderful world we live in. What a glorious time to be Singaporean....

Posted by: Wong Siew Hong | Jul 6, 2006 6:33:07 PM

33,
Mr Brown's column has always been a humour column. But humour's secret has always been the truth beneath it. It may not be the official "truth", and it may not even be the objective "truth", but it is a gut truth that people can identify it. That's what rings true and that's what makes humour funny.

I don't always agree with Mr Brown, but I'm sure what he wrote is what he felt. And that is his truth that he is sharing. It's sad and tragic that MICA's press secretary doesn't understand it and the govt seems to feel the need to shape the public truth.

Because the sad part is that the public truth will comfort the politicians but alienate them from the concerns of the people.

Posted by: locolobo | Jul 6, 2006 8:25:20 PM

as usual, sgprns c wat hppen after electioonss....evrtg go up except ur pay...

Posted by: aberden | Jul 6, 2006 8:41:46 PM


How can cultural art flourish when there is no allowance for diversity in opinions and forms of expression, Mr Bhavani? Are u encouraging still art -- still life. Is there life when it is still???

I got pissed off when threats were hurled, during debates, discussion and/or mild fun-poking satires/articles. Why can't we have good debates or arguments?? Where is the spirit? I got the impression that our schools are training our young ones to think out of the box and be able to engage in debates and argument. Our 'not so young' gahmen seemed unable to set examples, leh!

Mr Brown, I have always enjoy your compositions!! You're on my favourite link. Can understand what you're going thru' now. Very trying......


Posted by: mrbrown fan | Jul 6, 2006 9:29:02 PM

Hi,
Is our now famous Ms. K Bhavani, a POLITICTION???Come on! get on with it man, where we going???

Posted by: GCE'O' Lebel | Jul 7, 2006 12:19:17 AM

I remember the legend of Singapura. A legend I have learnt in primary school, a legend that was uniquely Singapore. I remember Sangnila Utama, the one who founded and named our little island. Will this be the first and last legend of Singapore.

The Legend
Prince Sang Nila Utama sailed out to sea with his men to explore some islands. While hunting in Riau, he spotted an island, and its sandy shore was pure white. His men told him that was the island of Temasek, and Sang Nila Utama decided to visit it.

They set sail for Temasek. A storm broke out while they were at sea. Huge waves rocked the ship and the ship was tossed about. Sang Nila Utama clench his fist and commanded the sea to calm off. When that did not work, he wielded his sword and bellowed threats at the sea. The sea did not yield. Instead, the waves begin to hit the ship more intensely.

On realizing that the sea has no respect for arrogance and opulence, he listened to the advice of one of his men to throw his crown into the sea. The storm immediately died down and was calm again.

Sang Nila Utama landed on the island and saw a beast with a black head, red tawny body and white breast, which ran away at the sight of the men. When asked what it was, an old man told Sang Nila Utama that it was a lion.

Sang Nila Utama thought this was a sign of good fortune thus deciding to stay on and become the king of Temasek. He renamed it "Singapura" or "Lion-City". This was how Singapore got her name. Sang Nila Utama was the first king of Singapore and he ruled wisely for 48 years and his wise deeds became the legend, passed down by to the people of then Singapura to Singaporeans of modern times…

The moral of the story
Respect is not earned by exercising authority, but by understanding the situation and handling matters with empathy.

The sea does not want Sand Nila Utama’s life, not even his throne. The sea wants respect, and the sea is not a slave of the Prince, and the sea wants justice and equality.

Hence by receiving the crown, the Prince’s self acclaimed air of superiority was dispersed, the sea felt appeased. Sang Nila Utama reached Singapura safely. If the sea’s grief was not consoled, even if the Prince managed to survive the storm, he will have to swim his life away to reach where he intended to go.

A person, no matter how well endowed, needs to understand the importance of having and listening to an entourage of wise advisors for support, guidance and direction in turbulent times. Sang Nila Utama had good advisors and also the graciousness to try out a solution, even if the solution needed him to eat a small humble pie by his standard.

Thus Sang Nila Utama saved his own life and even gained a Kingdom for the meager price of a crown.

What I actually want to say
We need more Sang Nila Utamas and wise advisors. We need to express ourselves effectively, fight for what we want and also know what “enough” is.

Posted by: H | Jul 7, 2006 12:27:22 AM

Ms K Bhavani is a disgrace to the civil service and suffers from the disease that pervades the entire PAP government today - "Arrogance Dementia". She states that "It is not the role of journalists or newspapers in Singapore to champion issues, or campaign for or against the Government" which is simply throwing egg on her own face. The PAP government has been cajoling and threatening Singapore journalists for decades into supporting government policy. Mr Lee Kuan Yew himself used the newspapers to stir up social unrest in order to gain independence for Singapore and the Chinese newspapers that supported the PAP in the 60's were branded communist subversives by the British colonial government. It is not hard to imagine the Minister for MICA "inviting" the Chief Editor of Today for tea and reminding him that "opinions which are widely circulated in a regular column in a serious newspaper should meet higher standards" and that currently "Today" is owned by a government corporation and Mr Editor will not be meeting these "high standards" if he does not put a stop to this. In fact, the quick suspension of Mr Brown's column by Today shows how drinking tea can be so effective in preserving the "good health" of Singapore. But it belies how deep the illness runs in the PAP government. Is the Minister furious that his own mouthpiece has been used against him? Is he feeling insecure that he's losing control over his propoganda machine? These are all signs of paranoia and typically found in sufferers from Arrogance Dementia.

Mr Brown has been accused of "hiding behind his pseudonym", and challenged "to come out to defend his views openly". If Ms Bhavani were to bother reading Mr Brown's blog, she would realise that Mr Brown has been nothing if not open. He has put his entire personal life on the web for all (including the ISD of course) to see (in case the ISD officers have difficulty identifying who to arrest due to severe short sightedness that also affects people suffering from Arrogance Dementia). In fact Mr Brown belongs to a rare breed in Singapore, the independent-minded Singaporean, to which Ms Bhavani certainly does not belong and I am sad to say few people in the PAP government today can claim to be.

Any citizen has the right to freedom of speech, as enshrined in the Singapore Constitution, whether he is a columnist or a reader writing in. It is ridiculous to say that expressing his views and feelings on matters affecting his life today is "exploiting his access to the mass media to undermine the Government's standing with the electorate". Is the PAP government so lacking in confidence in its own policies that it fears open debate? Fear of a defenceless citizen with no means of fighting back is another serious symptom of Arrogance Dementia.

Let's quit the quibbling and turn to the real issue at hand - the PAP government has lost touch with its people and needs to salvage itself in order to survive. Back to basics: a democratic government is a government by the people, for the people and of the people. Government is not owned by any one political party, civil servants are paid by tax payers and only there to work with the political appointees from one election to the next. By being in power too long and putting their friends and supporters into positions of power within the government, the military and the judiciary, the PAP party has subverted the functions of government servants to their own political ends. Let's not forget that the CEO of our telecom company (who has the power to block this website) is related to the lady who controls the country's reserves is related to the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice is an old Cambridge buddy of his father. If Singapore were a private company, this would be acceptable, but Singapore belongs to all Singaporeans and not to a small club of established and well connected people. How are the members of this club going to criticise each other for their mistakes and wrong doings if they are so closely connected and have so much to lose? For surely, no human is perfect and no government formed by humans can be perfect. The Prime Minister need only look at his own children from his first marriage to know that imperfect offspring can arise from otherwise perfect genes (or so his father would like to believe). Perhaps due to the emotional impact of this event, the elder Mr Lee sent the whole of Singapore down a dangerous path to eugenics and social engineering in the 80's that discriminates innocent children based on the academic qualifications of their parents (just to name one example). Many Singaporeans who could not protest with their voice voted with their feet and emigrated to other countries as a result of this and other mistakes of the PAP government. Still no one dared to voice any opposition.

So, is voicing an opposing view such a dangerous thing? Through hearing many views and debating who is right, people discover common ground that can serve the greater common good. From a selfish perspective, politicians who debate often become better politicians as they sharpen their wits against each other. The elder Mr Lee is an adept lawyer and a great politician and this should have been the first thing he realised when he cut his teeth as a trial lawyer. The problem with the younger generation of PAP politicians chosen mostly from "scholar" types with politically correct backgrounds is they are not used to being challenged and they have lost their edge (or more accurately, they never had one!). They are used to scoring well in school and succeeding in life and cannot broke criticism or failure. More importantly, they cannot empathise with the unsuccessful, the down-throdden and the people who find it tough to get by. And there are more and more of these people in Singapore as the system created by the PAP government emphasises elitism, success and wealth. This is very obvious in our schooling system where no other country in the world puts so much pressure on the children and outcasts so early (and without a second chance) those who are not "good enough". You need only ask any parent of a school-going child and watch "I Not Stupid Too" to realise there is a serious problem here. But no one dares to criticise so the system continues making mistakes unchecked.

From a self-serving PAP perspective, if Ms Bhavani and the Minister had more experience responding to criticism, she would not have handled the matter in such a heavy handed way as to piss off the sense of common decency shared by every man and woman in Singapore. She could have stated "the government takes mr brown's views very seriously and will look into some of the issues raised by him in order to see how the situation can be improved". A parliamentary committee can be called to debate the rising cost of living and what can be done about it, then recommendations can be put forward for a vote (that's assuming the PAP government were really interested in serving the people and not too busy congratulating themselves). This would have been a far more mature response and even if, cynically speaking, the PAP government did not want to deal with the matter, over time people would forget what the issues were as long as they've been heard (any married man knows the importance of listening to his wife complain even if she doesn't mean you to do anything about it!!!).

Let's accept it: politics is dirty, but the PAP government is doing itself a big disfavour by playing dirtier than ever. Even our cousins in Malaysia can recognise the mistakes made by Dr Mahathir and know how to correct them. If the Prime Minister finds it hard to emerge from the shadow of his father and overturn the mistakes made by him (and we will understand his personal dilema in this), he should put the interests of the nation before the interests of his own family and step down from office so that someone else can set Singapore back on the path to freedom and democracy and the nation can be strong again by learning how to criticise itself; so that we can create a better future for all Singaporeans and not just the privileged few.

In my humble view, Mr Goh Chok Tong did a pretty good job of it, considering the tight leash he was given. Hopefully, there is enough of the independent- minded "rare breed" left in the PAP to follow his lead (that's assuming of course they have not been systematically eliminated to pave the way for the younger Mr Lee).

Posted by: Lee How Chih | Jul 7, 2006 1:06:56 AM

Personally, I am FED UP with the constant increase of fares. And now Taxi fares are going up too! I wont be surprise if taxi fares goes up to $100 in the next 5 years. Im so pissed that the taxis keep hiding and nothing is done to it and the so called improve in services is some shitty comments such as " Taxi uncle's can learn to greet customers" do they think we care about the damn greeting? and also " taxi's can improve on the route journey as some of them doesnt know the routes well" so what is the taxi for? Shouldnt they already know their routes well enough before they become one? Now we have to pay additional amount for those services ?? SO DAMN STUPID. We should all start learning to jog/run to work, if we dont have enought $$ to own a car. No wonder more and more people are moving out of Singapore.

BTW, will we all be FINED writting this in your BLOG?? They are capable of anything wor....

Posted by: FED=UP! | Jul 7, 2006 1:24:40 AM

Oops they've did it again! Yes, they've suspended MB's column in Today officially. I'm not a regular reader of TODAY and neither am I a crazy MB supporter. But I do appreciate the efforts by MB to reflect the average man's feelings and thoughts when so many of us, termed Singaporeans are usually soft-spoken and prefers to stay out of trouble so that we are left alone.

So much for the Singapore public media being one-sided. This fact is actually even more blantantly represented with this conclusion coming from TODAY. I must say i'm not the least surprised by this decision, you've gotta remember the hands that feed you, you know?

I do hope the garmen still remember that they've commented on trying to ENGAGE the internet media with a softer approach, and not rule with an iron fist, as I now fear for the existence of this wonderful blog which i will visit occasionally for some laughs of its contents.

Posted by: whatsnew? | Jul 7, 2006 2:14:11 AM

I've been living in Singapore for the last three years and to begin with let me say that over the years the Singapore govt. has done a great deal for its people and its very rarely that one sees a success story like Singapore.
however, despite these advances, what I've seen and experienced here is a little disturbing. Its like 1984 played out in real life.. people do what the govt. wants them to do, when the govt. wants them to do it and the govt. takes full advantage of that. Where in the world outside of China and Iran would you find the govt. imposing censorship so liberally and without any form of protest by the people? Now, if the govt. was only censoring the nipples out FHM it would be reasonable, instead it censors anything that is even remotely critical of itself.. appears to me that somebody needs a lesson in accepting constructive critisicm
Now the fault isn't only with the powers that be. the people are equally to blame.. the general opinion i've come across is that the reason singapore is so clean, safe and efficient is because the govt. takes care of it and angering the govt. will lead in a loss of these privileges (not to mention sheltered walkways). Wrong!! the reason it is these things is because the people themselves choose it to be that way. yes the govt. takes the right steps to educate people and provides the infrastructure but that's the duty of the govt. it is why it exists in the first place. the real credit lies with the people and how to go about their lives and its high time Singaporeans started giving themselves some credit.

Posted by: Mr E | Jul 7, 2006 4:04:50 AM

The world revolving around PAP continue to suck@!
me being in US helps me see how bad the govt in sing has become! the govt officials even came here for talks but has nothing concrete to offer to entice singaporeans back in terms of more job opptys and really its better to go out of Singapore--USA is the best alternative! even here in Silicon Valley where cost of living is expensive, I can still save, NOT IN SING!
my 2 cents being away for somt time!

Posted by: Singaporean in US | Jul 7, 2006 4:24:56 AM

Jolly good. Although I was a little saddened by your jab at gifted students (myself being in the programme in my younger days), I empathise with you completely and applaud your gall in voicing out these issues in writing.

All I can say is that there's one thing severely lacking in our path to progress. The people have no voice. By this, I don't mean just ranting our views, but making them count. Our leaders have long since become complacent in their position and believe they have the right to rule. We have to take the power back. Even in the monarchies of ages past, a mandate had to be given. Else, the people would revolt as has happened to so many a complacent government. With democracy, the beauty of it is that we get to give our new mandate every 4 years. This makes it safe for us to take a chance. More importantly, in our case, it can tell our leaders that we don't think they have a right to govern us. They are our leaders by our choice. Honestly, I think that would really make further progress for the citizenry. No more carrot and stick for us. It's time for carrot and stick for THEM.

Hope everyone remembers this 4 years later, but I guess it's just too much to hope for. Precedents taken into account, we're just too 'safe' to take a chance like that. Hope your life and job don't get affected by all this, Mr. Brown.

Posted by: the UNDERDOG | Jul 7, 2006 6:28:18 AM

Mr Brown is in trouble because of what he wrote above. Free press does not exist in Singapore. Period. How many brave souls who stand up for our freedom and get screwed before we all wake up? It got this bad because we let it. It'll take close to a revolution to break the system. Question is, who is willing to stick his/her neck out. Someone who has nothing to lose, I bet. The gahmen uses fear to control us. When you have nothing to lose, you have nothing to fear. At the rate things are going, that day may come someday.

Posted by: pete | Jul 7, 2006 9:57:32 AM

Every Singapore citizen should have the right to voice their opinion on any issues without being censure. This is what we call the freedom of speech that is suppose to be integral part of a democratic society. So what happen to all the talk about openness and graciousness? Why can't journalist and columnist who can voice eloquently, issues that concern ordinary Singaporeans without being censure? Is sad that till now progress in this area is still lagging.

Posted by: King | Jul 7, 2006 10:17:03 AM

Do we need a V here to awaken us?
Watch V for Vendetta, a powerful movie that tells where we may be heading...

Posted by: V | Jul 7, 2006 10:25:24 AM

If it were not for K. Bhavani, I would never have heard about Mr. Brown or read the postings here (I live in HK with no access to Today). Thank you K. Bhavani.
Mr Brown and all the attendant postings - very insightful, interesting, humorous, witty and to the point. I like How Chih Lee's comments. Excellent. Keep it up. In fact, I hope those in power are reading not just Mr. Brown's pieces but also paying heed to the general under-current expressed in the postings attached. I would love some of these comments to be submitted to the Straits Times Forum - assuming the ST will dare to publish such letters.

Posted by: Spore Observer | Jul 7, 2006 10:37:25 AM

Hey you guys, why are you complaining. aren't all these expected. Remember that it was you who put them in government. You had the chance just 2 months ago to prevent these but did not. You got what you deserved. You will get another go 5 years from now, so don't stuff it next time.

Posted by: Ah Charn | Jul 7, 2006 11:00:09 AM

We have our trade union call N**C "Fixed" Income. But dont worry if your income dont increase! to curb with rising costs, "Progress And Pay" is always there to help. So relax guys.

Posted by: Country that Plans | Jul 7, 2006 12:11:56 PM

The sad thing is...I don't even get to vote. Walkover in my GRC. Many of my friends have never voted before. I didn't put this government there. And I have no way of voting them down...

Posted by: Charlotte Exile | Jul 7, 2006 12:28:18 PM

It is indeed very sad to see the S'pore government backs track on it's supposed vision of a more open, embracing society (recap: what the MICA minister said some weeks after the election and which mr brown was also invited and even had his election blogs praised as 'classic').

Well the repercussion will be to drive the audience to the Internet for discussion of alternative views. Of course the government can try censorship (like IP address blockage) but technology marvels will make this a futile exercise.

More than ever this sad episode just reinforces the widespread perceptions that
1) the Singapore media is just a government mouthpiece with no backbone whatsoever;
2) the present government leadership lives under the long shadow of you know who; and
3) costs go up after elections without fail (which in some cases are incidental but by brushing mr brown off it just tells everyone: it's real but shut up will you?)

As for those who are after Ms Bhavani's blood, well she's just the government hench-woman. But from a PR view, her performance is a disaster. If I am Donald Trump assessing her performance as my PR person in an episode of 'The Apprentice', I'd say to her and her entire management 'YOU'RE FIRED! ALL OF YOU!"

Posted by: Cynical patriot | Jul 7, 2006 3:16:27 PM

What MB and Wayne Rooney have in common? they both got gobsmack and they both got red carded for stupid reasons.

Posted by: gobsmack | Jul 7, 2006 4:01:01 PM


"I may disagree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" Voltaire, 1694-1778

Lucky Voltaire, he'll be dead if he lives here.

Posted by: km | Jul 7, 2006 4:41:28 PM

We're slaves with white collars....
And we're learning slowly that fact.
And we're very, very pissed off.

Posted by: ghooseman | Jul 7, 2006 4:44:55 PM

who is this K. Bhavani??? a mouth piece for the minister/ministry or gov as a whole? or she just willingly play the bad guy here for her superior? this 'journalist' manupulating the masses with politics sounds familier. It came from someone senior ...

but I bet if she is to stand for election or if she is an MP she wont say that...

why??? sure kena humtum

Posted by: cimchye no more! | Jul 7, 2006 4:54:56 PM

Hi, Bhavani is a civil servant. These reply is not hers (and it's a lady, not a gentleman, the head of public affairs in MICA, NOT a politician) - she's just doing her job. Believe me, there was probably a small committee behind the reply, all career civil servants needing to make a point on behalf of the government.
mb wrote a satirical piece (albeit slightly more cynical and negative than usual, but still, satire). To compare him as a person with a partisan agenda... I can only shake my head and wear a rueful expression. The reply was patronising, to say the least. I don't need to be reminded that IT is important for the country, nor that we have the oh-my-god-bless you Progress package to tide over the rising COL. the reply is also illuminating in highlighting just how those in power view the electorate - we are essentially unable to think or discern for ourselves. I like Caroline's view - we are a nation, a people, unaccustomed to criticism, unused to the push-and-shove of healthy discourse, and I fear the worst for our future.
You guys may ban TODAY and condemn them, but do you think they had a *choice* in dropping mb? No way man.
mb, sally forth my man! If we have to couch our politics in gastronomic metaphor, so be it!

Posted by: guan | Jul 7, 2006 5:18:00 PM

While the cost of living is rising, did you notice that our roads everywhere are being resurfaced with a new coat of pavement? Most of these roads appear to be in very good condition to begin with. Why is it necessary to spend the money to fix something that is still quite good?

Posted by: nite | Jul 8, 2006 12:56:30 AM

i sympathise with MrB - have only just started reading his blog. Yes, i am backward in blogspace.
good article but unfortunately as i'm always inclined to say - as much as the government insists / says we're a democratic island and what not, its a HIGHLY CONTROLLED democracy. Voices are not heard and those who're able to make themselves heard are always stopped.

Posted by: sporeaninhk | Jul 8, 2006 12:17:37 PM

Singapore is a dictatorship and its people are scared little sheep. When are you all going to wake up and realize that?

Posted by: hollisbrown | Jul 8, 2006 1:13:12 PM

Democracy?

Isnt it Republic of Singapore?

Posted by: xXx | Jul 8, 2006 2:35:37 PM

As foreigner here in Singapore. I am truly amazed on how the Government takes care of its citizens compared to ours.But I am equally shocked on how they treat people with a different point of view.

Posted by: iddqd101 | Jul 8, 2006 3:03:24 PM

this is Singapore...live it or leave it!
all u guys are juz plain NATO


Posted by: mmm | Jul 8, 2006 4:21:13 PM

Hi, all i can say is i am losing my respect in many aspects (passing costs back to the people) and looking at spme of their policies with skeptism. And also issues with regards to the two hotly contested areas, they can forget about winning back the two areas, period.
You have my support Mr Brown.

Posted by: Lee | Jul 9, 2006 10:34:27 AM

The government's response is childish, to say the least. Ironically, this has given more publicity and credence to Mr Brown.

Posted by: Raj | Jul 9, 2006 12:21:47 PM

The Sing. Govt. has no b*lls. They are afraid of little people like Mr Brown.

Posted by: joehancll | Jul 9, 2006 10:33:25 PM

i wish i was living in a poor african nation now. no disrespect to d nation but ebola virus and malnutrition sounds so much better than being asked to shut up and being penalised for our views.
whats that mr minister? dun hide behind humour? i'm laughing so hard that u think all this is funny. now that's really funny. all together now.. ha ha ha.
u become like chee soon juan, they kill u off. u become like mr brown, theyre in d process of killing u. so wat do they want u 2 become? they want us to become dogs. thats rite, i said dogs. woof woof. fetch doggy doggy. sit down. y dogs u may ask? cos real dogs dun need dog muzzles. they're saving it for us,singaporeans.

Posted by: Egoman | Jul 10, 2006 1:14:25 AM

I would think this a rather fair and amusing commentary going by "world class" standards. I'm sure i've seen much harsher comments made by writers in papers in New York or Britain or even Japan on the state of their nations or Gahmens. And this article is like so mild and as usual hilarious in Mr brown style.

The articles sanctioning this article made me overestimate the contents of this greatly! (I read those b4 i got to read this:p)

I've always liked reading Today or newsisfree.com for this more "differing views" and flexible reporting. I hope we can continue on this trend of more media freedom, and at the same time outsmart those people trying to put "safety nets" on us.

Ideas are things that roam free, there is nothing that can restrict the way they fly from one person to another and especially the way they fly on the internet or on print.

If one fears ideas instead of confronting them, they are simply afraid of facing new challenges.

Posted by: Tengsoon | Jul 10, 2006 2:10:17 AM

To thank Mr.Brown for all his laughs we had together,my mum and I would like to wear brown Today (haha) and for lunch we will be having bak chor mee with chilli and tur kwar for her, and without chilli and tur kwar for me.

Sincerely Thomas

Posted by: Thomas | Jul 10, 2006 11:06:31 AM

Brown for Prime Minister!!!

Brown for Prime Minister!!!

Posted by: Ah Chan | Jul 10, 2006 12:31:04 PM

昨天我老婆在越洋電話裡哭,哭著問我何時可以回新加坡陪伴他跟新生的女兒,我只能告訴他,在甚麼都漲,就只有薪水不漲的新加坡,如果要活的不算太拮据,至少要有一點基本門檻要滿足,我寧願放棄現有收入的三分之一,但還是找不到回新加坡的工作,我已經找一年了。

PxP的諸公們,把我的希望還給我。

Posted by: 甚麼都漲 | Jul 10, 2006 12:37:06 PM

I'm quitting and leaving this country for good unless the other one-third of the ruling party also gets renewed.

Posted by: ShutUp | Jul 10, 2006 1:11:16 PM

I am Singaporean and have produced two Singaporean boys who, if we don't migrate first, will do NS and and hopefully get to vote here sometime in their lifetimes (even the vote-once-get-a-platoon-of-MPs kind). My concerns are long term.

Singapore outperformed many other countries despite severe disadvantages because it differentiated itself early through a kind of machine-like efficiency. This required quite a lot of silencing impediments like people who tell inconvenient truths. Overall, I must say it has worked wonderfully so it seems the end has justified the means. You only need to try out the services of the Civil Service of almost any other neighbouring country to find out what you definitely do not need. On measurably parameters like purchasing power per capita, literacy, average lifespan, safety, etc., Singaporeans should really be very thankful.

That was the last 41 years. Going forward, however, we are faced with a very different scenario.

Our 'efficiency' differentiation has reached a plateau while other countries are climbing the learning curve very quickly. Improving efficiency is a rather self-fulfilling thing once it gets started, especially with IT and the internet, so I would guess China, India, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brazil, etc. are going to get to Singapore's current level in about 10-15 years. Already advanced but rowdy countries like Russia, Taiwan, and South Korea will probably get there even faster.

From then on our size disadvantage is going to get rather cruelly exposed. If nothing is done, Singapore is probably going to relegated to the likes of some South Pacific island, minus the coral reefs and beautiful beaches.

The government, of course, knows this. Its response has mainly been to promote global direct investment (so we can at least own a part of other countries' growth) and R&D (so we can come up with money making stuff that doesn't need geographical or population size to support - almost any kind of mass production or service is already cheaper in a larger country like China or Inda, and will get even cheaper once they get their acts together).

The long-term success of global direct investment is questionable. Once outside the confines of your own country, you are subject to the kind of vagaries that you have no control over. Economic might overseas is also highly dependent on deep pockets from economic output at home, to overcome the advantage that locals in foreign countries have.

I suppose the government hopes to generate economic output in future through high-level research activities i.e. Singapore as a sort of 'brain' for other countries' brawn. Unfortunately, that kind of super high-level creativity and technical brilliance comes only in an environment which allows uncompromising intellectual enquiry, and a tolerance for non-conformists.

It is very hard to imagine great leaps of the imagination, the kind that gave birth to things like the PC or internet, the LOTR (book and movies), Beethoven's 5th, the Theory of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, etc., here in Singapore. Not only do these kinds of quantum leaps require great talent and industry, they also require great courage built upon a long tradition of challenging the status quo. It is very likely, in my opinion, that the great discoveries of the future will not come from Singapore.

Of course, I have my near-term worries, concerns and irritations about how the PAP is running this place. I also happen recognize that a lot of things are very good indeed in Singapore, due to what the PAP has done. The net effect, however, given my gloomy projection and with two sons who show great inhtellectual promise (at least to me), I really wonder if Singapore is the place for them to achieve great things.

Posted by: Jann | Jul 10, 2006 1:29:22 PM

Singaporean so kiasu... what else the gahmen.. want malaysia s@nd want malaysia airsp@ce, want takeover malaysia @ir-@sia... In Malaysia we no segregate students with grades.. result char then work at mamak loh.. also can drive BMW.. result good get good job loh.. anywhere, everywhere are jobs.. me IT in penang macam no future, but MY gahmen so kind open another MSC in penang just to open work opportunity for commoners like me, i Love malaysia very the much

Posted by: malaysian | Jul 10, 2006 6:40:43 PM

supporting you and free speech, from across the Strait.

Posted by: __earth | Jul 10, 2006 7:13:20 PM

In Singapore, it's a crime if we gather or speak in public without a police permit. But is it also a crime in Singapore if we pray and ask God to quickly recall some people to heaven so that our lives on earth will become better, or must we also apply for a prayer permit?

Posted by: fcuk | Jul 10, 2006 7:37:11 PM

hands up all of u who were at raffles place wearing brown. stand in one straight line. go go! give me ur ic's. (officers proceed 2 check d particulars on their walkie talkies)
stretch out your hand. we're gonna put this plastic cuffs, sorry we ran out of real handcuffs. now one by one all of u step inside d unmarked van. you dun have d right to speak. you dun have the right to a lawyer. your family dont have a right to know ure arrested. Amen.

Posted by: Egoman | Jul 10, 2006 7:42:40 PM

Hi Mr. Brown and Mr. Miyagi,

I heard these words recently:

"Sometimes you gotta break the rules.
You never know when you're gonna get something inspired."

Kudos to both of you who have jumped out of your comfort in the box, and what an inspiration you are to so many of us. Thank you so much for bringing such humour, fun and joy in your articles and podcasts of our daily Singapore lives, especially after the humour, they give me another perspective from my fellow Singaporeans.

Moreover, what pride I have to be a Singaporean, to see the “wear brown” support shown at the MRT Stations today for Mr. Brown. Seeing these, I truly believe there are more good things to come, thoughts-maturing of our population and better development of our country.

MB & MM, please continue your good work, I look forward to more of your humourous but funny “analysis”. :-D

Thank you all.

HP

P.S.: BTW, how do I get on the contact list of the support Mr. Brown and Mr. Miyagi list?

Posted by: HPLam | Jul 10, 2006 8:23:43 PM

MB and MM,
very sad that this is the kind of treatment. PM Lee had said he was worried when people got no opinion. He wanted all to speak out, in agreement or otherwise, and he wanted to talk about disagreements. But look what had happened? Shame on you, PM Lee. Please say something, whether you agree with MITA or Dr Vivian.

Posted by: YayaPapaya | Jul 10, 2006 10:56:52 PM

this national day wear BROWN not red and white !!!!!!!

Posted by: pop | Jul 11, 2006 2:59:44 AM

Hmm.

"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."

-Karl Marx

Posted by: Crawldaddy | Jul 11, 2006 9:33:45 AM

This is singapore...style and way of living...

Posted by: wenniee | Jul 11, 2006 10:58:18 AM

So then who is to be blamed for all these high costs?
I my opinion, all those cowardist Singaporeans who either owned shares in PAP linked groups of company or in fear of losing their lifelihood are to be blamed. For they had chosen to cast theirs votes on PAP to make them and us Pay And Pay And Pay And Pay And Pay And Pay And Pay ........

Posted by: Psalmist | Jul 11, 2006 5:53:54 PM

"Quod te non occidit, te certe fortiorem reddere poterit”
[That which does not kill will only serve to make you stronger]

Your column on rising costs of living in Singapore is a fact and echos the sentiments of many.

Thank you for the good work that you and Mr. Miyagi has done. I have also learnt that he has quitted from TODAY. Please continue the good work. You guys deserved our support.

Keep up the excellent work!

"I have fought the good fight. I have finished the course. I have kept the faith." 2 Timothy 4:7

Posted by: KH | Jul 11